1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Radom Network vs RefToken: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Radom Network (Radom Network Limited) and RefToken (RefToken Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
Radom Network outranks RefToken by +0.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.6 vs 1.4)
On supervisory breadth, Radom Network holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RefToken holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Radom Network | RefToken | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.6 | 1.4 | +0.2 | Radom Network |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.9 | 1.4 | +0.5 | Radom Network |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.4 | 1.9 | +0.5 | RefToken |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.7 | +0.1 | RefToken |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Radom Network vs RefToken
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Radom Network | RefToken |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Radom Network Limited | RefToken Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2H 9JQ | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Radom Network and RefToken against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Radom Network vs RefToken
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Radom Network or RefToken?
Both Radom Network and RefToken hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Radom Network maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RefToken maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Radom Network and RefToken?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Radom Network records an Overall Score of 1.6 (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with RefToken at 1.4 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.4, Brand: 1.9, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Radom Network and RefToken differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Radom Network lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RefToken lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Radom Network or RefToken?
Radom Network carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RefToken carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.