Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Pepperstone vs Radom Network: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Pepperstone (PEPPERSTONE GROUP LIMITED) and Radom Network (Radom Network Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: pepperstone-vs-radom-network

Pepperstone outranks Radom Network by +5.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.6)

On supervisory breadth, Pepperstone holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 6 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Radom Network holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightPepperstoneRadom NetworkScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.01.6+5.4Pepperstone
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.01.9+4.1Pepperstone
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0Pepperstone
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.01.4+5.6Pepperstone
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.01.6+5.4Pepperstone

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Pepperstone vs Radom Network

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Pepperstone vs Radom Network
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Pepperstone and Radom Network.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributePepperstoneRadom Network
Primary Legal NamePEPPERSTONE GROUP LIMITEDRadom Network Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings4 regulated / 6 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 16, Tower One, 727 Collins Street Melbourne, VIC Australia 3008 Sea Sky Lane, B201 Sandyport, Nassau New Providence, The Bahamas71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2H 9JQ
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX trading, commodities, index CFDs, stock CFDs and related servicesMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, Vietnamese, English, ThaiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Pepperstone and Radom Network against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Pepperstone vs Radom Network

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Pepperstone or Radom Network?

Pepperstone holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 0). Specifically, Pepperstone maintains 6 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, DFSA, SCB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Radom Network maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Pepperstone and Radom Network?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Pepperstone records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Radom Network at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.4, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Pepperstone and Radom Network differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Pepperstone lists FX trading, commodities, index CFDs, stock CFDs and related services with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Radom Network lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Pepperstone or Radom Network?

Pepperstone carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Radom Network carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Pepperstone vs Radom Network (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger