1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
LMAX Group vs whitebit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of LMAX Group (LMAX Group) and whitebit (whitebit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
LMAX Group outranks whitebit by +2.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas whitebit holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | LMAX Group | whitebit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | LMAX Group |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | LMAX Group |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | LMAX Group |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | LMAX Group |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.9 | 5.0 | +2.9 | LMAX Group |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: LMAX Group vs whitebit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | LMAX Group | whitebit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | LMAX Group | whitebit |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register): #FVT000351Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS): Not suppliedCNB: Not suppliedPolish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF): Not suppliedBulgarian National Bank (BNB): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM | J. Basanavičiaus g. 26, Vilnius, LT-03224, Lithuania |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Other languages, English | Other languages, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare LMAX Group and whitebit against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: LMAX Group vs whitebit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: LMAX Group or whitebit?
whitebit holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 3). Specifically, LMAX Group maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSPR, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas whitebit maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between LMAX Group and whitebit?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), LMAX Group records an Overall Score of 7.9 (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with whitebit at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do LMAX Group and whitebit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5], while whitebit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: LMAX Group or whitebit?
LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while whitebit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.