1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXTM vs whitebit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXTM (Forextime Ltd) and whitebit (whitebit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
FXTM outranks whitebit by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FXTM holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas whitebit holds 5 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 5 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXTM | whitebit | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FXTM |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FXTM |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | FXTM |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FXTM |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | FXTM |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXTM vs whitebit
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXTM | whitebit |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Forextime Ltd | whitebit |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 5 regulated / 5 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register): #FVT000351Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS): Not suppliedCNB: Not suppliedPolish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF): Not suppliedBulgarian National Bank (BNB): Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 35, Lamprou Konstantara Street, FXTM Tower, Kato Polemidia, CY-4156 Limassol | J. Basanavičiaus g. 26, Vilnius, LT-03224, Lithuania |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot metals, Trading services, CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | FXTM Trader, Forex Trading, MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Arabic, Armenian, Bahasa, Bengali, Cantonese, Chinese, Czech, Persian, French, German, Hindi and other languages | Other languages, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXTM and whitebit against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXTM vs whitebit
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXTM or whitebit?
whitebit holds more active regulated filings (5 vs 3). Specifically, FXTM maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas whitebit maintains 5 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), CNB, Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXTM and whitebit?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXTM records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with whitebit at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FXTM and whitebit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXTM lists Spot metals, Trading services, CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks with execution software [FXTM Trader, Forex Trading, MT4, MT5], while whitebit lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXTM or whitebit?
FXTM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while whitebit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.