1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ITI Capital vs RubyMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ITI Capital (ITI Capital Limited) and RubyMarkets (RubyMarkets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
ITI Capital outranks RubyMarkets by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, ITI Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RubyMarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ITI Capital | RubyMarkets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 1.0 | +6.0 | ITI Capital |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | ITI Capital |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | ITI Capital |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | ITI Capital |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | ITI Capital |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ITI Capital vs RubyMarkets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ITI Capital | RubyMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ITI Capital Limited | RubyMarkets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 33 Tower 42, 25 Old Broad Street, London EC2N 1HQ, United Kingdom | GB |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, indices, metals and energy | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai and Hindi, among other languages | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ITI Capital and RubyMarkets against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ITI Capital vs RubyMarkets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ITI Capital or RubyMarkets?
ITI Capital holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, ITI Capital maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RubyMarkets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ITI Capital and RubyMarkets?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ITI Capital records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with RubyMarkets at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do ITI Capital and RubyMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ITI Capital lists FX, indices, metals and energy with execution software [MT4], while RubyMarkets lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ITI Capital or RubyMarkets?
ITI Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RubyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.