Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DBG Markets vs RubyMarkets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DBG Markets (DBG Markets Limited) and RubyMarkets (RubyMarkets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: dbg-markets-vs-rubymarkets

DBG Markets outranks RubyMarkets by +6.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, DBG Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RubyMarkets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDBG MarketsRubyMarketsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.01.0+6.0DBG Markets
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.01.0+6.0DBG Markets
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.01.0+4.0DBG Markets
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.01.0+6.0DBG Markets
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.01.0+5.0DBG Markets

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DBG Markets vs RubyMarkets

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DBG Markets vs RubyMarkets
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DBG Markets and RubyMarkets.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDBG MarketsRubyMarkets
Primary Legal NameDBG Markets LimitedRubyMarkets
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressFirst Floor, First St Vincent Bank Ltd Building James Street Kingstown St. Vincent and the Grenadines. 16 BEDFORDVIEW TERRACE 48 ARTERIAL ROAD EAST BEDFORDVIEW 110 Bishopsgate, London, England, EC2N 4AY. Govant Building, BP 1276, Port Vila, Vanuatu. ROOM 1804 BEVERLY HOUSE, 93-107 LOCKHART ROAD, WAN CHAI, HONG KONG.GB
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCommodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, StocksForex
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Vietnamese, Indonesian, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DBG Markets and RubyMarkets against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DBG Markets vs RubyMarkets

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DBG Markets or RubyMarkets?

DBG Markets holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, DBG Markets maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RubyMarkets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DBG Markets and RubyMarkets?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DBG Markets records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with RubyMarkets at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do DBG Markets and RubyMarkets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DBG Markets lists Commodities, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [MT4, MT5], while RubyMarkets lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DBG Markets or RubyMarkets?

DBG Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RubyMarkets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DBG Markets vs RubyMarkets (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger