1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Billon Group vs Sucden: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Billon Group (Billon Group) and Sucden (Sucden Financial Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
Sucden outranks Billon Group by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Billon Group holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sucden holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Billon Group | Sucden | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Sucden |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | Sucden |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Billon Group vs Sucden
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Billon Group | Sucden |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Billon Group | Sucden Financial Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London, England, EC4N 6AF | Sucden Financial Limited Plantation Place South 60 Great Tower Street EC3R 5AZ United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Metals (base metals, precious metals, steel, iron ore), foreign exchange (FX), soft and agricultural commodities, energy, fixed income |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Russian, Chinese, and other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Billon Group and Sucden against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Billon Group vs Sucden
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Billon Group or Sucden?
Sucden holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Billon Group maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sucden maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Billon Group and Sucden?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Billon Group records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Sucden at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Billon Group and Sucden differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Billon Group lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Sucden lists Metals (base metals, precious metals, steel, iron ore), foreign exchange (FX), soft and agricultural commodities, energy, fixed income with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Billon Group or Sucden?
Billon Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sucden carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.