1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
RugDoc vs SimpleHold Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of RugDoc (RugDoc) and SimpleHold Wallet (SimpleSwap Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
RugDoc outranks SimpleHold Wallet by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, RugDoc holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SimpleHold Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | RugDoc | SimpleHold Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | RugDoc |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | RugDoc |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | RugDoc |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | RugDoc |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | RugDoc |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: RugDoc vs SimpleHold Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | RugDoc | SimpleHold Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | RugDoc | SimpleSwap Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Project review and risk rating, community support and consultation | Digital asset management |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare RugDoc and SimpleHold Wallet against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: RugDoc vs SimpleHold Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: RugDoc or SimpleHold Wallet?
Both RugDoc and SimpleHold Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, RugDoc maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SimpleHold Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between RugDoc and SimpleHold Wallet?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), RugDoc records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SimpleHold Wallet at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do RugDoc and SimpleHold Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
RugDoc lists Project review and risk rating, community support and consultation with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SimpleHold Wallet lists Digital asset management with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: RugDoc or SimpleHold Wallet?
RugDoc carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SimpleHold Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.