1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
MarSwap vs RugDoc: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of MarSwap (MarSwap) and RugDoc (RugDoc) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
MarSwap and RugDoc are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, MarSwap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RugDoc holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | MarSwap | RugDoc | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | RugDoc |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: MarSwap vs RugDoc
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | MarSwap | RugDoc |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | MarSwap | RugDoc |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | GB | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cross-chain trading, automated market maker | Project review and risk rating, community support and consultation |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare MarSwap and RugDoc against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: MarSwap vs RugDoc
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: MarSwap or RugDoc?
Both MarSwap and RugDoc hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, MarSwap maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RugDoc maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between MarSwap and RugDoc?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), MarSwap records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with RugDoc at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do MarSwap and RugDoc differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
MarSwap lists Cross-chain trading, automated market maker with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RugDoc lists Project review and risk rating, community support and consultation with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: MarSwap or RugDoc?
MarSwap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RugDoc carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.