Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

LMAX Group vs Prodigy: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of LMAX Group (LMAX Group) and Prodigy (Prodigy Trading LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: lmax-group-vs-prodigy

LMAX Group outranks Prodigy by +5.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs 2.8)

On supervisory breadth, LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Prodigy holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightLMAX GroupProdigyScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.92.8+5.1LMAX Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.92.8+5.1LMAX Group
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.02.0+3.0LMAX Group
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.92.8+5.1LMAX Group
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.92.8+5.1LMAX Group

Visual Architecture Benchmark: LMAX Group vs Prodigy

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: LMAX Group vs Prodigy
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between LMAX Group and Prodigy.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeLMAX GroupProdigy
Primary Legal NameLMAX GroupProdigy Trading LTD
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressYellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOMOffice number 208 White Swan building Near World Trade Center Metro Shaikh Zayed Road, Dubai , UAE Level 3 Ebene House, Hotel Avenue, 33 Cybercity, 1721-04, Port Louis, 72201, Mauritius.
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and moreMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT5
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare LMAX Group and Prodigy against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: LMAX Group vs Prodigy

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: LMAX Group or Prodigy?

LMAX Group holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, LMAX Group maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSPR, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Prodigy maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between LMAX Group and Prodigy?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), LMAX Group records an Overall Score of 7.9 (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Prodigy at 2.8 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.8, Brand: 2.8, Market Influence: 2.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do LMAX Group and Prodigy differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Prodigy lists general financial services with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: LMAX Group or Prodigy?

LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Prodigy carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

LMAX Group vs Prodigy (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger