Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

LMAX Group vs PayeCards: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of LMAX Group (LMAX Group) and PayeCards (PayeCards Global Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: lmax-group-vs-payecards

LMAX Group outranks PayeCards by +4.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs 3.0)

On supervisory breadth, LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PayeCards holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightLMAX GroupPayeCardsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.93.0+4.9LMAX Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.93.0+4.9LMAX Group
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.02.0+3.0LMAX Group
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.93.0+4.9LMAX Group
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.93.0+4.9LMAX Group

Visual Architecture Benchmark: LMAX Group vs PayeCards

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: LMAX Group vs PayeCards
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between LMAX Group and PayeCards.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeLMAX GroupPayeCards
Primary Legal NameLMAX GroupPayeCards Global Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN): Not suppliedFinancial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS): Not supplied
Registered Domicile / AddressYellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOMC/O Dirench & Co, 151 West Green Road, Seven Sisters, London, N15 5EA, United Kingdom
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and moreDigital banking, cryptocurrency exchanges and services, payment processing
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesOther languages, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare LMAX Group and PayeCards against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: LMAX Group vs PayeCards

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: LMAX Group or PayeCards?

LMAX Group holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 2). Specifically, LMAX Group maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSPR, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PayeCards maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between LMAX Group and PayeCards?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), LMAX Group records an Overall Score of 7.9 (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with PayeCards at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do LMAX Group and PayeCards differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5], while PayeCards lists Digital banking, cryptocurrency exchanges and services, payment processing with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: LMAX Group or PayeCards?

LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PayeCards carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

LMAX Group vs PayeCards (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger