1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
iCede vs MYMA FXFP: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of iCede (iCede Solutions Limited) and MYMA FXFP (MYMA FXFP LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
iCede outranks MYMA FXFP by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.9)
On supervisory breadth, iCede holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MYMA FXFP holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | iCede | MYMA FXFP | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 1.9 | +0.1 | iCede |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 1.9 | +0.1 | iCede |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.9 | +0.1 | iCede |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 1.9 | +0.1 | iCede |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: iCede vs MYMA FXFP
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | iCede | MYMA FXFP |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | iCede Solutions Limited | MYMA FXFP LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 321, The Cotton Exchange, Bixteth Street, Liverpool, L3 9JR, United Kingdom | 71 - 75 SHELTON STREET, LONDON, ENGLAND WC2H 9JQ 201, Osho Tower, Sardarpura, Jodhpur. Rajasthan (Ind) 342001 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Technical services, software development | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Energies, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare iCede and MYMA FXFP against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: iCede vs MYMA FXFP
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: iCede or MYMA FXFP?
Both iCede and MYMA FXFP hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, iCede maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MYMA FXFP maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between iCede and MYMA FXFP?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), iCede records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with MYMA FXFP at 1.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.9, Market Influence: 1.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do iCede and MYMA FXFP differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
iCede lists Technical services, software development with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MYMA FXFP lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Energies, Commodities with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: iCede or MYMA FXFP?
iCede carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MYMA FXFP carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.