1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ICE FX vs Point: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ICE FX (ICE Markets Limited) and Point (Point Trader Group LTD) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
ICE FX outranks Point by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.6 vs 1.5)
On supervisory breadth, ICE FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Point holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ICE FX | Point | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.6 | 1.5 | +0.1 | ICE FX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.6 | 1.5 | +0.1 | ICE FX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.5 | +0.1 | ICE FX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.6 | 1.5 | +0.1 | ICE FX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ICE FX vs Point
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ICE FX | Point |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ICE Markets Limited | Point Trader Group LTD |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 2nd Floor Sancroft Rose Street Paternoster Square London City of London EC4M 7DQE C 4 M 7 D Q UNITED KINGDOM 3rd Floor, Jalan OKK Awang Besar, 87000 Labuan FT, Malaysia | Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, MH 96960, Marshall Islands Cairo Business Plaza, 90th North Street, 6th Office 617, Cairo, Egypt |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot metals, CFDs, Currency pairs | FX, indices, energy, CFDs, US stocks, agriculture, precious metals, cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ICE FX and Point against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ICE FX vs Point
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ICE FX or Point?
Both ICE FX and Point hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ICE FX maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Point maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ICE FX and Point?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ICE FX records an Overall Score of 1.6 (Risk & Licensing: 1.6, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Point at 1.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.5, Brand: 1.5, Market Influence: 1.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do ICE FX and Point differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ICE FX lists Spot metals, CFDs, Currency pairs with execution software [MT4], while Point lists FX, indices, energy, CFDs, US stocks, agriculture, precious metals, cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ICE FX or Point?
ICE FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Point carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.