1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXTM vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXTM (Forextime Ltd) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
SCDEX outranks FXTM by +2.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 7.0)
On supervisory breadth, FXTM holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXTM | SCDEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 9.3 | +2.3 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 9.5 | +2.5 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 9.3 | +5.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 9.2 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 9.4 | +2.4 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 9.1 | +2.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXTM vs SCDEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXTM | SCDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Forextime Ltd | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Low risk |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 35, Lamprou Konstantara Street, FXTM Tower, Kato Polemidia, CY-4156 Limassol | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Spot metals, Trading services, CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances |
| Execution Software & Terminals | FXTM Trader, Forex Trading, MT4, MT5 | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Arabic, Armenian, Bahasa, Bengali, Cantonese, Chinese, Czech, Persian, French, German, Hindi and other languages | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXTM and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXTM vs SCDEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXTM or SCDEX?
FXTM holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 0). Specifically, FXTM maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXTM and SCDEX?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXTM records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).
How do FXTM and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXTM lists Spot metals, Trading services, CFDs, Commodities, Forex, Stocks with execution software [FXTM Trader, Forex Trading, MT4, MT5], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXTM or SCDEX?
FXTM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.