1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FAC vs Spreadco: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FAC (Fund Admin Chain) and Spreadco (Spread Co Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
Spreadco outranks FAC by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FAC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Spreadco holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FAC | Spreadco | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | Spreadco |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | FAC |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | Spreadco |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Spreadco |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | Spreadco |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FAC vs Spreadco
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FAC | Spreadco |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Fund Admin Chain | Spread Co Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 4th Floor, 140 Aldersgate Street, London, United Kingdom, EC1A 4HY. | 22 Bruton Street, London W1J 6QE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FAC and Spreadco against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FAC vs Spreadco
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FAC or Spreadco?
Spreadco holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FAC maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Spreadco maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FAC and Spreadco?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FAC records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Spreadco at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FAC and Spreadco differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FAC lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Spreadco lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FAC or Spreadco?
FAC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Spreadco carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.