1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CyStellar vs FAC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CyStellar (CyStellar Ltd) and FAC (Fund Admin Chain) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
CyStellar and FAC are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, CyStellar holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FAC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CyStellar | FAC | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | CyStellar |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CyStellar vs FAC
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CyStellar | FAC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CyStellar Ltd | Fund Admin Chain |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 71-75 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London, WC2H 9JQ, United Kingdom | 4th Floor, 140 Aldersgate Street, London, United Kingdom, EC1A 4HY. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | technology company | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CyStellar and FAC against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CyStellar vs FAC
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CyStellar or FAC?
Both CyStellar and FAC hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CyStellar maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FAC maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CyStellar and FAC?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CyStellar records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with FAC at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CyStellar and FAC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CyStellar lists technology company with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FAC lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CyStellar or FAC?
CyStellar carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FAC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.