Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CGFX vs LMAX Group: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CGFX (Commercial Group FX) and LMAX Group (LMAX Group) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: cgfx-vs-lmax-group

LMAX Group outranks CGFX by +2.9 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.9 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, CGFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas LMAX Group holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCGFXLMAX GroupScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.07.9+2.9LMAX Group
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.07.9+2.9LMAX Group
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.05.0+1.0LMAX Group
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.07.9+2.9LMAX Group
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.9+1.9LMAX Group

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CGFX vs LMAX Group

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CGFX vs LMAX Group
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CGFX and LMAX Group.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCGFXLMAX Group
Primary Legal NameCommercial Group FXLMAX Group
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressPremier Business Center, 10th Floor, Sterling Tower, 14 Poudriere St.Yellow Building 1A Nicholas Road London W11 4AN UNITED KINGDOM
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesPrecious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, CommoditiesForex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishOther languages, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CGFX and LMAX Group against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CGFX vs LMAX Group

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CGFX or LMAX Group?

LMAX Group holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, CGFX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas LMAX Group maintains 3 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSPR, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CGFX and LMAX Group?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CGFX records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with LMAX Group at 7.9 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.9, Brand: 7.9, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do CGFX and LMAX Group differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CGFX lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Commodities with execution software [MT5], while LMAX Group lists Forex, precious metals, stock indices, commodities, cryptocurrencies and more with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CGFX or LMAX Group?

CGFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while LMAX Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CGFX vs LMAX Group (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger