Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

CapitalXtend vs Spreadco: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CapitalXtend (CapitalXtend) and Spreadco (Spread Co Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: capitalxtend-vs-spreadco

Spreadco outranks CapitalXtend by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, CapitalXtend holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Spreadco holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightCapitalXtendSpreadcoScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.07.0+2.0Spreadco
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.03.0+3.0CapitalXtend
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.04.0+1.0Spreadco
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.0+1.0Spreadco

Visual Architecture Benchmark: CapitalXtend vs Spreadco

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: CapitalXtend vs Spreadco
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between CapitalXtend and Spreadco.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeCapitalXtendSpreadco
Primary Legal NameCapitalXtendSpread Co Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSuite 201 The Catalyst 40 Silicon Avenue Cybercity, 72201 Eben, Republic of Mauritius22 Bruton Street, London W1J 6QE
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCFDs on Forex, Stocks, Indices, Spot Metals and Spot EnergyFX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare CapitalXtend and Spreadco against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: CapitalXtend vs Spreadco

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CapitalXtend or Spreadco?

Both CapitalXtend and Spreadco hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CapitalXtend maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Spreadco maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CapitalXtend and Spreadco?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CapitalXtend records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Spreadco at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do CapitalXtend and Spreadco differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

CapitalXtend lists CFDs on Forex, Stocks, Indices, Spot Metals and Spot Energy with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Spreadco lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CapitalXtend or Spreadco?

CapitalXtend carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Spreadco carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

CapitalXtend vs Spreadco (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger