1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BUX vs Mada FX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BUX (BUX Financial Services Limited) and Mada FX (Mada FX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
BUX outranks Mada FX by +5.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, BUX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Mada FX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BUX | Mada FX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | BUX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | BUX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | BUX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | BUX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | BUX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BUX vs Mada FX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BUX | Mada FX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BUX Financial Services Limited | Mada FX |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lima Carna Building,Office 101,67 Franklin Roosevelt Ave,Limassol 3011 | 2nd Floor, 145-157 St. John Street, London, EC1V 4PY, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, commodities, interest rates, bonds, stocks, indices, ETF and Spread Betting trading services | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BUX and Mada FX against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BUX vs Mada FX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BUX or Mada FX?
BUX holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, BUX maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Mada FX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BUX and Mada FX?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BUX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Mada FX at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do BUX and Mada FX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BUX lists FX, commodities, interest rates, bonds, stocks, indices, ETF and Spread Betting trading services with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Mada FX lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BUX or Mada FX?
BUX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Mada FX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.