1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Blockgram vs RMTFinancial: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Blockgram (Blockgram) and RMTFinancial (RMTFinancial) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar
RMTFinancial outranks Blockgram by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.6)
On supervisory breadth, Blockgram holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RMTFinancial holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Blockgram | RMTFinancial | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.6 | 3.0 | +0.4 | RMTFinancial |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.6 | 3.0 | +0.4 | RMTFinancial |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.6 | 3.0 | +0.4 | RMTFinancial |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.6 | 2.0 | +0.6 | Blockgram |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Blockgram vs RMTFinancial
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Blockgram | RMTFinancial |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Blockgram | RMTFinancial |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 5021 N 20th Street, Unit 10262, Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, USA | 19 Rue del'industrie, 8069Bertrange,Luxemburg |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Blockgram and RMTFinancial against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Blockgram vs RMTFinancial
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Blockgram or RMTFinancial?
Both Blockgram and RMTFinancial hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Blockgram maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RMTFinancial maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Blockgram and RMTFinancial?
In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Blockgram records an Overall Score of 2.6 (Risk & Licensing: 2.6, Brand: 2.6, Market Influence: 2.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with RMTFinancial at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Blockgram and RMTFinancial differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Blockgram lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RMTFinancial lists Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Blockgram or RMTFinancial?
Blockgram carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RMTFinancial carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.