Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ALB vs Spreadco: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ALB (ALB LIMITED) and Spreadco (Spread Co Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: alb-vs-spreadco

Spreadco outranks ALB by +1.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.6)

On supervisory breadth, ALB holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Spreadco holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightALBSpreadcoScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.67.0+1.4Spreadco
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.03.0+2.0ALB
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.76.0+0.3Spreadco
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.07.0+2.0Spreadco

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ALB vs Spreadco

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ALB vs Spreadco
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ALB and Spreadco.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeALBSpreadco
Primary Legal NameALB LIMITEDSpread Co Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address48, CASA ROMA, SIR AUGUSTUS BARTOLO STREET, TA’ XBIEX XBX 1099, MALTA22 Bruton Street, London W1J 6QE
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies, Commodities, BondsFX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesSpanish, Italian, Czech, English, GermanEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ALB and Spreadco against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ALB vs Spreadco

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ALB or Spreadco?

Both ALB and Spreadco hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ALB maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (MFSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Spreadco maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ALB and Spreadco?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ALB records an Overall Score of 5.6 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Spreadco at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do ALB and Spreadco differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ALB lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Energies, Commodities, Bonds with execution software [MT4], while Spreadco lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ALB or Spreadco?

ALB carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Spreadco carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ALB vs Spreadco (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger