Skip to content
London Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

AIMS vs Spreadco: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AIMS (Auric International Market PTY LTD) and Spreadco (Spread Co Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected financial house and brokerage records: United Kingdom, Ireland and Gibraltar

DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: aims-vs-spreadco

AIMS and Spreadco are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 7.0)

On supervisory breadth, AIMS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Spreadco holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightAIMSSpreadcoScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.07.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.03.0+4.0AIMS
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.06.0+1.0AIMS
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.0+1.0Spreadco

Visual Architecture Benchmark: AIMS vs Spreadco

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: AIMS vs Spreadco
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between AIMS and Spreadco.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeAIMSSpreadco
Primary Legal NameAuric International Market PTY LTDSpread Co Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressUnit Level 9F(2), Main Office Tower, Financial Park Labuan, Jalan Merdeka, 87000 Federal Territory of Labuan, Malaysia.22 Bruton Street, London W1J 6QE
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesCurrencies, Cryptocurrencies, Global Stocks, Global Indices, Metals and CommoditiesFX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Malay, EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare AIMS and Spreadco against other regulated peers in our selected financial house and brokerage records: united kingdom, ireland and gibraltar slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: AIMS vs Spreadco

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AIMS or Spreadco?

Both AIMS and Spreadco hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AIMS maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, Labuan FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Spreadco maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AIMS and Spreadco?

In London Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AIMS records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Spreadco at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do AIMS and Spreadco differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

AIMS lists Currencies, Cryptocurrencies, Global Stocks, Global Indices, Metals and Commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Spreadco lists FX, indices, commodities, stocks and related services CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AIMS or Spreadco?

AIMS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Spreadco carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

AIMS vs Spreadco (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | London Firm Ledger